Kentucky's Office for the
Americans with Disabilities Act

Kentucky ADA logo and link to home page


Section 504 and Anti-discrimination Principles

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in federally funded programs. This section was modeled on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. Title VI prohibits programs receiving federal funds from discriminating against students on the basis of race or national origin; Title IX does so on the basis of gender. Section 504, Title VI, and Title IX all apply to school-to-work systems and programs. Students who are limited-English proficient are also protected by the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, which requires educational agencies to take action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by students in instructional programs.
 

A.  Understanding §504 Requirements
In order to understand §504 requirements, school-to-work policymakers, administrators, and educators need to attend to four sources of §504 obligations:

  • The §504 statute itself
  • The U.S. Department of Education/Office for Civil Rights regulations implementing §504 (21)
  • The U.S. Department of Labor/Office for Civil Rights regulations implementing §504 (22)
  • The U.S. Department of Education/Office for Civil Rights "Guidelines for Eliminating Discrimination and Denial of Services on the Basis of Race, Color, National Origin, Sex and Handicap in Vocational Education Programs" ("OCR Guidelines") (23).

B.  Scope of §504 Statute
The §504 statute itself states:
"[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefit of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance . . . ." (24).

As virtually all state educational agencies, local school districts, public schools, and vocational schools receive federal funds, virtually all are required to comply with §504. So, too, are most postsecondary schools, such as technical institutes, junior colleges, community colleges, and four-year colleges. Local partnerships receiving implementation grants under the School-to-Work Act (or other federal funds) are also subject to §504.

C. Who is Protected from Discrimination Under §504
Under §504, an "individual with a disability" is anyone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity (25).  Major life activities include caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working (26). For purposes of school-to-work systems and high school-level vocational education programs, a youth with a disability is "otherwise qualified" under §504 - and so protected against discrimination - if non-disabled youth of his or her age may take part, or if state law or the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act entitles youth of that age to public education (27).

D. Section 504 Regulations Help Define Discrimination
Because the School-to-Work Act is jointly administered by the U.S. Departments of Education and Labor, school-to-work systems must comply with the §504 regulations of both agencies. In addition, receipt of Perkins Act funds, or any other funds from the Department of Education, independently triggers the obligation to comply with the Department of Education's §504 regulations.

The §504 regulations provide further detail about what constitutes unlawful disability-based discrimination. They also set out affirmative steps that education agencies and programs must take to ensure that youth with disabilities receive full educational opportunity.

E.  Section §504 Regulations and Prohibited Practices
The Department of Education and Department of Labor §504 regulations include identical, extensive lists of prohibited discriminatory practices. These prohibitions are designed to ensure that youth with disabilities have an equal opportunity to gain the same benefits, obtain the same results, and reach the same level of achievement as their non disabled peers. For example, school-to-work systems, partnerships, and programs (and any other programs that receive or benefit from federal funds) may not -

  • Deny a youth with a disability the opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs
  • Provide youth with disabilities the opportunities to participate and benefit that are unequal to those offered their peers
  • Provide youth with disabilities with programs, benefits, or services that are not as effective as those provided to their peers
  • Provide youth with disabilities with lower-quality programs than those provided their peers
  • Provide different or separate programs to youth with disabilities, unless this is necessary in order to deliver services that are as effective as what other youth receive (28)

F.  Section 504 Regulations and Affirmative Obligations
The Department of Education §504 regulations also require schools to evaluate the educational needs of youth with disabilities and to provide special education supports, related services, and reasonable accommodations to students who need them (29). Schools must take these steps for all students who have disabilities within the meaning of §504, even if they are not protected by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (30).

G.  OCR Guidelines for Eliminating Discrimination and Denial of Services on the Basis of Race, Color, National Origin, Sex, and Handicap in Vocational Education Programs
The U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights Guidelines' provides further details for compliance with §504 (as well as Title VI and Title IX). The guidelines apply to all recipients of federal funds that offer or administer programs of vocational education or training, including state educational agencies (and other public agencies), local education agencies or school districts, high schools, secondary-level vocational schools, postsecondary schools and programs, and local partnerships implementing programs under the School-to-Work Act.

OCR issued the guidelines in 1979 after discovering a pattern of civil rights violations during compliance reviews of vocational education programs conducted from 1973 to 1978. In regard to students with disabilities, OCR found that eligibility requirements, such as admissions tests, often denied students vocational education opportunities on the basis of disability; students often were impermissibly assigned to separate programs; students were denied equal opportunities as a result of inaccessible facilities and poor evaluation procedures; and vocational education administrators often failed to protect students against discrimination by participating employers (31).

The guidelines were explicitly intended to end these abuses (32). They address a wide range of issues, including:

  • The responsibility of state agencies to prevent, identify, and remedy discrimination by the local programs to which they give federal funds
  • Equitable distribution of federal, state, and local funds
  • Recruitment efforts and admission criteria
  • Accessibility of buildings and equipment
  • Provision of related aids and services
  • Discrimination by cooperating employers
  • Practices that disproportionately impact students on the basis of disability, race, or gender

Specific provisions of the guidelines are discussed in subsequent chapters.

Back to School-To-Work

ADAKY HOME


We welcome your feedback! Please contact us for questions or comments about this site.

Contact Us
Norb Ryan, Kentucky ADA Coordinator
Lisa Fort, Secretary
Teresa Caldwell, Facilities Specialist
Education Cabinet

500 Mero Street
Capital Plaza Tower, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502-564-3850
TDD 711
Fax: 502-564-23
16
Email: NorbJ.Ryan@ky.gov
           LisaK.Fort@ky.gov
           TeresaA.Caldwell@ky.gov

Kentucky Education Cabinet